Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reality: Resurrection!

Back to Guilds

relax with us 

Tags: contests, games, variety 

Reply 6: Pansophic Polls
Word for the Wise, July 23

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

100%
 100%  [ 6 ]
Total Votes : 6


Uadzit
Crew

Ghostly Shapeshifter

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:50 am


Topic: Stupor & stupid

Sometimes even the most obvious word connections can lead to surprising links in our lexicon. Take a question about stupor and stupid. As you might have guessed, those terms share an ancestor, and that ancestor gave our lexicon plenty of other terms.

The Latin stupere means "to be benumbed, be astonished, be stupefied." A noun-derivative of stupere traveled from Latin into Middle English, where it appeared in the 14th century as stupor, "a condition of greatly dulled or completely suspended sense or sensibility." It took another century before the verb stupefy entered English. Influenced by Middle French, the immediate source of the English word, stupefy actually has ancestry in the Latin stupefacare: stupere (which you'll remember means "to be benumbed; astonished; stupefied"); plus facere, meaning "to make." Not surprisingly, stupefy entered English with the sense "to make physically stupid, dull, or insensible; benumb."

It wasn't until the 16th century that the adjective stupid made its way into English, followed, in the next century, by another adjective, stupendous.

But we'll bet one long-ago relation of stupere leaves you stupefied: type. It turns out the Latin ancestor of stupor, stupefy, stupid, and stupendous is akin to a Greek word meaning "to strike; beat;" and which is the ancestor of the verb type.

Questions or comments? Write us at wftw@aol.com Production and research support for Word for the Wise comes from Merriam-Webster, publisher of language reference books and Web sites including Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh Edition.
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:20 pm


that really doesn't surprise me at all.

think of the word "stunning"; we think maybe of a performance, or a gown.

but of course it starts out being something which leaves you stunned, as in not killed but certainly incapacitated.

think Star Trek: "set phasers on stun!" (instead of on fricassee).

so back when the words were coined, the best way to stun, OR stupefy someone, was not to make a brilliant performance or design an exquisite piece, it was to sneak up behind them with a rock or a big wooden club and bash them on the head.

makes perfect sense to me!

chessiejo


The Name of the Rose
Crew

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:37 am


So my typing could actually stupefy someone... lol
Reply
6: Pansophic Polls

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum