|
|
What do you think? |
I like them. |
|
62% |
[ 10 ] |
Um... |
|
37% |
[ 6 ] |
|
Total Votes : 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:59 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:04 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:09 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:53 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:08 pm
|
|
|
|
Dirty Dirty Shisno Alpine Dragon uhhh... I guess no oe likes them. I know I don't. And no, thats not weird. Other than the fact that that s**t would never happen. Not weird.
You know, it's common courtesy to, rather than crudely stating that art is bad, at least explain your reasoning behind it. That's what a good critique does.
For instance:
Personally, I think that, for the style, it could have been done better if you chose certain pictures. Rather than just chunking the general digivolutions of the digimon, something that makes them look less like they are just standing there... maybe something about the digimon that adds a romantic aspect to it, like having them maybe facing each other or the like, at the least.
Other than that, it is a fair attempt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|