|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:49 pm
|
|
|
|
sudden theory that came to me- Theres been a lot of things about Petunia... her secret knowledge of magic, the protection spells on the house. Why? Well, Lilly, Harrys mother.... supposedly "mud-blood"... what if this isn't true? Think... Lilly and petunia's grandparents, one of which is magic, the other muggle. They give birth to one child, lilly's parent, who is muggle, or maybe squib. Lilly is born, witch. What if Petunia is a squib? Would thsi mean something? Or else why introduce this idea in the past books?? If petunia knows magic, could this change it all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 3:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 3:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:03 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:56 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:05 am
|
|
|
|
A few points before I start. 1. If they've died, they're dead. J.K. Rowling is a classy lady who is not writing a soap opera. Sirius and his brother are dead; Harry's parents are dead; Dumbledore is dead. Dead, dead, dead, and without loopholes! They will not come back (except, perhaps, as personality imprints, like in book four), because they can't.
2. Those who die will not be plot points or deus ex machinas. There will be a logical reason that makes sense with their personality, none of this "omg Herm-oh-ninny gunna die and Harry's gunna be all oh no you didn't!" As I have said, Jo is a classy lady, and she can write.
Alright, to the theories. 1. Percy's going to die. No reason, I just hate him. 2. Snape is evil and I hate him and I hope he trips and falls off a cliff and into a pirahna-infested pool. 3. Draco and his mom are offed by a traveling bunch of shippers, who want to free up Pansy Parkinson for Professor Snape. It goes something like this: Draco and Narcissa: /dies Pansy: Nooo! Snape's Fish-Eaten Corpse: Heeey. Pansy: Oooh. 4. Hermione and Ginny are secretly lesbians. You know how the British are. 5. OMG Dumbledore actually survived the Killing Curse! Apparently, it's been used so much, it's starting to wear thin–like this joke. Come on, guys, stop being silly.
Serious Theory Time: 1. The seventh book is going to be freaking awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 10:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 10:54 pm
|
|
|
|
Mad Madam Mimm sudden theory that came to me- Theres been a lot of things about Petunia... her secret knowledge of magic, the protection spells on the house. Why? Well, Lilly, Harrys mother.... supposedly "mud-blood"... what if this isn't true? Think... Lilly and petunia's grandparents, one of which is magic, the other muggle. They give birth to one child, lilly's parent, who is muggle, or maybe squib. Lilly is born, witch. What if Petunia is a squib? Would thsi mean something? Or else why introduce this idea in the past books?? If petunia knows magic, could this change it all?
Nah. J.K denied that D: Someone who has shown no magical tendencies will begin to show them, but it will NOT be Petunia. I thought so at first as well. She's blatantly denied that, however. My money's on Dudley, though it doesn seem a bit cliche...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 11:07 pm
|
|
|
|
Hakura88 Pandalover263 I really dunno... although I think the... omg, I'm way to tired to look it up... those three inital thingies. I've worked it out, and I'm ALMOST positive that it's Sirius' brother that's talked about. I mean, think about it. She states in one of the previous chapters talking to... crap, I'm way to tired, the dude who took over potions... that they were a match set! She delibrately talked about him! Either a really good teaser or a hint... Yeah, I think RAB is Regulus Black. I remember on a Harry Potter website (either Leaky Cauldron or Veritaserum), it was announced that his middle name starts with an A. I can't remember what the name was though.
I want to think it's Regulus. I mean, they never actually mentioned much about his death, and JK normally doesn't leave blanks unless it's for a reason. Plus, It's a known fact that Regulus was a death eater, and the Horcrux snatcher is assumed to be a death eater. It all seems to fit. I think that Regulus will play a part, or else why would JK have mentioned him? I think that Harry might come to assume it's Regulus then a nice big, and faulty, chase will ensue and we'll all be happy that we were right. We'll all believe Harry because of the last book when he assumed malfoy's association with Voldemort and it turned out he was right, though he was denied :} It just seems so cliche...I think I'll be very dissapointed in JK if RAB is Regulus.
Wow, I have three posts in a row...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|