|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:49 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:08 pm
 |
|
|
|
Timo Supremo Efstathios I almost want Obama to become president just because this whole white supremacy thing needs to die. White supremicy! WHITE SUPREMECY! There is no group dicriminated against more than white males. Can't freaking take a step without troding down some poor minority person, who only claims such because they'll get special rights! Stop fealing so sorry for people. The United States was called a land of opportunity. Why? because of the free market. Slavery is illegal, there are no Jim Crow laws, we give out social security and welfare! If someone can't improve their own life it's because they aren't willing to put forth the effort. Stop looking at people and envying what they have! No rich person will ever tell you that you are working too hard, it's only poor, envious fools who say such things.
Way to take a quote out of context much? I can argue both sides of that, on one hand minorities are getting special privileges, on the other hand we still have yet to have a president that is not a rich white male.
I so badly want a middle-class black, Jewish, liberal, lesbian to run. With enough minorities, she just might win. (I mostly want this because of the hilarity factor).
I leave you with a quote,
Anatole France The law, in it's majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread. |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 7:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 3:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:49 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:04 pm
|
|
|
|
Hillary for sure. on the other hand you have a cross dressing republican that will only keep us at war, I just got out of the military so I know the real reasons for this war and why my friends are suffering and dying. Its to make the rich, richer, and spread there power and influence further in the middle east. You also have Bama, who is a cool guy, but honestly he is only there to take the black vote from the democratic party. He is too young and has his whole political career in front of him. He will have to play by there rules if he wants to get reelected or wants to have any kind of future in politics. In the process he will owe to many favors. Hillary on the other hand will have Bill to help her in the middle east, has nothing to loose by stepping on toes, will socialize health care, and will try to make a difference for the hard working Americans instead of lining the pockets of the elite like all republicans do. think of the military budget, and all the other smaller budgets that are directly affected by war, there all on contracts to companies owned and run by the rich and powerful. so tell me why as a mechanic in the army I have to order a 50cent piece of hose for a Humvee from the factory for over $200? the answer is simple, because it funnels all of our tax dollars, through no bid contracts to companies that make an incredible profit, who then "shear the wealth" with the politicians who got them the contract. last time we had a Clinton in office, there was 8 yrs of discussion, working toward peace. but if you look back, every time we have a republican, we go to war. in the end, war is a money making machine. if all Americans do not vote Hillary, or at the least democrat, expect to see more dying, a bigger national deficit, and a bigger gap between the upper and lower class, because lets face it there is no middle class anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:04 pm
|
|
|
 |
Kalathma I seriously don't want Hilary to win. She's made quite a few bad choices in life (like, oh, not divorcing Bill when it was obviously known he was cheating on her.) Not only that, but all of those censor-ship laws. D< Ugh.
your right, standing by your husband, for richer or poorer, through sickness and in health. etc, what a horrible decision. everyone makes mistakes. when she made those vows, she meant them, so few people these days do. and the censorship laws. heaven forbid she try to protect the innocents of our children, by making them put a rating system on movies and video games. look at our culture, and how perverse and violent it has become, there are no more morales and values. why do you think that is? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:23 pm
|
|
|
|
I would like to comment on the recent Caucus in Iowa. It seams the American people are compleatly for backing Obama in the democratic side, with Edwards and Clinton in a close second, and the Republicans are after Huckabee, closely followed by Romney and Thompson, Giuliani wasn't even in the top three. If you would like to use this as a starting point, then for Obama to continue in the reace, he would have to take second in New Hampshire, and Clinton needs to take first to continue on with the race as well(which she will need to take from Edwards, so either Clinton or Edwards will drop out of the race in the next four days)
Giuliani needs to keep hold of his first place record in NH or he will have to drop out, but Huckabee could lose out on the rest of the states from here on out, becasue if he doesn't win the nomination, the Evangilist Christians have already said if Huckabee doesn't win nomination they are going to split the party.
I just thought you'd like to know this stuff...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
