|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:57 pm
|
|
|
|
Orientation helps define who you are. In reality, there isn't much difference between homosexuals, bisexuals, metrosexuals, etc... We all fall in love, we all feel passion, we all hurt, we all live. Also, I agree with Yotsu. You cannot choose your orientation, you are born that way. It just takes some time for people to realize, or accept, who they are. That's why it's possible to hear people claiming to be homosexual or bisexual at the age of 10. They just realized/accepted it sooner than others. Now, as for gay marriages...woo-hoo do I have one heck of a comment for this. This is a pet peeve of mine, one which I encounter frequently. I have been told several times. Same-sex couples aren't the optimum environment in which to raise children. This is 100% NOT true. Check it out: murderers, convicted felons of all sorts, even known child molesters are all allowed to freely marry and procreate, and do so every day, with hardly a second thought, much less a protest, by these same critics. So if children are truly the priority here, why is this allowed? The fact is that many gay couples raise children, adopted and occasionally their own from failed attempts at heterosexual marriages. Lots and lots of scientific studies have shown that the outcomes of the children raised in the homes of gay and lesbian couples are just as good as those of straight couples. The differences have been shown again and again to be insignificant. Psychologists tell us that what makes the difference is the love and commitment of the parents, not their gender. The studies are very clear about that. And gay people are as capable of loving children as fully as anyone else. We're all humans, after all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:57 pm
|
|
|
|
I think homosexuals are totally fine. I have some friends that are gay, and a friend that is bi. Gay guys great! They're so funny, and seem to be better understanding women, and clothing, and the like (like in queer eye for the straight guy!). Anyway, I think gay marriage is fine, but can't they be happy just living together? Some heterosexual couples do that too. A friend of mine has parents that are happily living together, but aren't married. Actually, it might just be simpler that way, especially if you want to divorce. You just move out! I don't think gays should be having those gay parades either. They are just asking for it. Critisism I mean. And why would they want that? Hm.. what else was I going to say..?. Ugh, I am so out of it today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:32 pm
|
|
|
|
fantasier_xp I think homosexuals are totally fine. I have some friends that are gay, and a friend that is bi. Gay guys great! They're so funny, and seem to be better understanding women, and clothing, and the like (like in queer eye for the straight guy!). Anyway, I think gay marriage is fine, but can't they be happy just living together? Some heterosexual couples do that too. A friend of mine has parents that are happily living together, but aren't married. Actually, it might just be simpler that way, especially if you want to divorce. You just move out! I don't think gays should be having those gay parades either. They are just asking for it. Critisism I mean. And why would they want that? Hm.. what else was I going to say..?. Ugh, I am so out of it today.
Hmmm. I am a lesbian and the idea or homosexual marrige (or a non-marrige but a contract) makes total sense to me. If a gay person is dying in the hospital, their partner will not be allowed to visit if the parents don't want it. Their children, if they have any in partnership, will possibly be taken away from the partner and give to the parents of the dying/dead partner. If they bought a house together, there will be problems in who inherits what. If not a legally recognized marriage, then at least a contract addressing these problems would help enormously.
As for the outrageous parades and so forth, it is generally the most agressive people who open the doors for the more quiet people. Im not a dress it up, outrageous dyke, but I will march in the parades and wave and smile at the weird guys and gals. lol They only make me laugh, cause they are having such great fun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 5:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 9:21 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 1:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:43 pm
|
|
|
|
Roman Shepherd Well, to start, gay marriage in the secular world shouldn't even be a discussion. Within religions, it's up to the leaders and teachings of that religion to decide if gay marriage will be sanctioned. Homosexuals bugging the Christians or Jews for gay marriage doesn't make sense. In the destruction of sodom, gay sexual intimacy is not only shown as immoral and evil, but also as a weaponized evolution of excess. There are some issues here though. Gay pride parades have reached a point of excess that's simply uncalled for. Homosexuals banding together is fine, however, parading through the streets in minimal or overly suggestive clothing and throwing condoms into crowds has nothing to do with pride. It is rather an embarassment, that makes all the teachings of the faith which see it as immoral seem true. Gay people should not claim that their relationships are any more intense than straight relationships, and thus should not display them as requiring some extra flamboyancy. The problem is that homosexuality is sometimes simply a sexual orientation, in which case those who fall under this category should be treated the same as heterosexuals. However, if it is chosen as some kind of elevated fetish, then it should be as hidden as anyone would hide any strange fetish. Decadence is supressed in religion always for a reason. There is such thing as moral decay, and public indecency. The people who are craving a full strength sexual revolution are often simply thinking on more animalistic terms, having not witnessed the consequences of a society defiled by excess. This can be compared to anti-war advocates who have never truly looked into all aspects of war. Had world war 2 not raged across the many lands which it did, than the furnaces of the holocaust would have continued to blaze. Though motives in warfare can always be questioned, there are truly just motives, where force was needed to combat corruption and evil. I'm using the word evil abit liberally here, but that's an entirely different debate all together. Anyways, the trick, as always, is that equal rights DOES NOT mean special treatment, and some groups and individuals need to figure out which they are really grabbing for.
OMG thats like all my thoughts summed up exactly. Gay pride parades are demoralizing and embarassing. If they dont want people to hate them they shouldnt have gay fancy little parades thet just strengthens the common social stereotype and screws over all the other gay people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|