|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 10:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 2:40 pm
Twiganut wheee ... impossi-quessting for an angelic pendant o.0 *tosses dice* Angelic Pendant isn't an impossi-quest. 550K is actually attainable. Gold Halo is a true impossi-quest. 20 Mill. eek I gave up on even trying for that a long time ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 6:21 pm
ameshinju I agree with this idea and say, go for it! (Oshousama_Raistlin, I have sent you a trade for 10 gold) However, LemonWarlord posted something a while back that I disagree with. While they are trying to keep the price of the angelbow at 30k people will buy them for 30k, keep them for a while, get tired of them and sell them again at lower price, not higher, then it would be purchased by the union and sold for 30k again. Since the price is at 30k it would be stupid to price it higher, it would never sell. Good point, but there's always that percent that will never sell it unless it inflates. I think about 75% of the population would be like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 6:38 pm
I would help buy angel bows but I never really have more than 10K at a time! XD I would happily help (as long as I get 1 free angel bow)! Anyway, I think it is a good idea to corner the market on angel bows! Its not as easy as it sounds though! P.M. me as soon as you get this union into action! I'll totally join!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 9:18 pm
aww... the price is way under 30K sad They're not moving very fast either crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 12:26 am
lol I already have 3 sign me up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:30 am
Twiganut Israk There's always going to be people oppossed to this idea you know i know but its FUN, to poke hole in peoples arguments! Lol. I agree. blaugh It's also great when they poke holes in our own arguments: makes us think. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:34 am
LemonWarlord I wish you guys saw the light >.> This isn't Anti-Inflation, this is Artificial-Inflation. Say this Union actually goes somewhere, and keeps the price stable at 30k. What if the Union runs out? Are you going to buy the more expensive ones, to sell at a loss? I doubt that. All you're doing is promoting inflation. No. This is Anti-inflation and Anti-depreciation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:40 am
LemonWarlord Twiganut LemonWarlord I wish you guys saw the light >.> This isn't Anti-Inflation, this is Artificial-Inflation. Say this Union actually goes somewhere, and keeps the price stable at 30k. What if the Union runs out? Are you going to buy the more expensive ones, to sell at a loss? I doubt that. All you're doing is promoting inflation. he has a point ... but if the common price is 30k then who would sell it for 40k or 50k ... noody would but them ... unless your a complete n00b ... we trying to keep it from plummeting! Wow... I guess you don't know some economics? What if you run out? Then they wouldn't have to sell at 30k would they. And do you know how many angelbows are on Gaia? Alot. It is unlikely that angelbows will 'run out' as such. Not for a long time (I'd say a year or so), at which point there will be a new discussion within the union as to what the new union price should be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:42 am
Twiganut Twiganut LemonWarlord Twiganut LemonWarlord I wish you guys saw the light >.> This isn't Anti-Inflation, this is Artificial-Inflation. Say this Union actually goes somewhere, and keeps the price stable at 30k. What if the Union runs out? Are you going to buy the more expensive ones, to sell at a loss? I doubt that. All you're doing is promoting inflation. he has a point ... but if the common price is 30k then who would sell it for 40k or 50k ... noody would but them ... unless your a complete n00b ... we trying to keep it from plummeting! Wow... I guess you don't know some economics? What if you run out? Then they wouldn't have to sell at 30k would they. excuse mee ... i think i understand economics i little better than you think, esp. since im taking business ... and run out ... we already HAVE run out ... they were a donation item in may 2006 ... it was released with the chain of command ... so ther ealready IS a limited supply ... but if there is a majority of items being sold at and around 30k than logic and economics dictated that the price will be driven LOWER not higher in order to compete with them! yeah ... i did manage to make 5k ... and get my mask for the GiB party next week ... is anyone interested in attending? ... Its gonna be SO awesome .. were having a big old masquerade ... and all the organizations involved with the plots, and were hoping 12 will come .. cause he all still here and ... ... ... ... well anyone interested in coming? ... Dang. I came back too late! >.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:44 am
LemonWarlord Lets say you maintain it at 30k for a month. Or maybe a year at best. You guys run out of Angelbows. But people still want the Angelbows. They used to be able to buy it at 30k. Now they can't anymore, so they have to buy at higher prices. It's logic. It's based on supply and demand. Once your group, with all the Angelbows is gone, people still want it. So demand rises, and your supply is gone. It'll only drop. Don't kid yourself. I've seen the mp enough to know that. (See above comment about a discussion occurring within the union on a new standard price when that eventually happens)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:48 am
LemonWarlord Twiganut thats true except, people normally set their price acording to tekteks list ir the going rate on the market which would be 30K ... of course the price would fluctuate a bit but would remain in and around the same place! HAHHAHAHA! That just made me laugh. Those who guy by tektek are stupid. Tektek is only useful for trending, and spotting AI talk2hand Search G Pin in tektek. It says 12.5k. In reality, it's worth 50k. talk2hand Since you are laughing (and calling people stupid), that invites me to laugh at your stance...though I would still prefer to keep this discussion civil and intellectual. Your previous comments were acceptable, but please refrain from being particularly rude or you may be black listed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:50 am
Twiganut LemonWarlord Twiganut LemonWarlord Twiganut thats true except, people normally set their price acording to tekteks list ir the going rate on the market which would be 30K ... of course the price would fluctuate a bit but would remain in and around the same place! HAHHAHAHA! That just made me laugh. Those who guy by tektek are stupid. Tektek is only useful for trending, and spotting AI talk2hand Search G Pin in tektek. It says 12.5k. In reality, it's worth 50k. talk2hand ... how do you think they predict the expected preice if not through trend spotting question ... you watch the trends and guess what is going to happen next .. right now it has been relatively stable at around 26K .. so one can assue that it wont spike much higher than 30k in then next little while ... Pfft... it's the Great Gaian Depression if you didn't know. Might be a while until the economy becomes completely normal. I'm guessing around the summer, it should be fixed for sure. Then it will definitely raise up to 30k. But... you're not going to sustain 30k for long if demand beats supply. I'll have to give you that ... in the long run it isnt gonna work ... but were atleast goona try and control the price even its for a little bit ... but this is all hypothesis ... i mean i dont even have ONE angel bow ... yet! Hey, twiganut: congrats on staying polite and civil even when lemon was being rude. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 6:43 am
Silent Comet I have to disagree. Quote: For a quester, wouldn't it also be frustrating to know that the item you quested for and just purchased at X price had suddenly gone down in value? Live with it. Questers dream of the day when they happen to come across a good deal in the MP for what they are questing. Back when I got my coco (aaages ago when newbs could actually afford it) I scoured the marketplace a couple times a day, hoping that someone would happen to make a mistake in the price when they put it up, or were just feeling nice that day. It's the same in real life. Say you make a big purchase then it goes on sale a week or two later. You're upset, but you live with it. No one can tell the future, you can guess at it and act accordingly, but you just have to live with what it gives you. True. But Gaia is not the real world: sure, it follows some of the same rules, but not to the same extent as the real world does. Since Gaia is not the real world, does it not follow that Gaia could actually be made to be either better or worse than the real world, depending upon how gaians act within it?
For example: some of the inflation on gaia is at a rate that either rivals or beats the rate that would be experienced in a full-blown Depression. Other times, the deflation on gaia beats the worst recession. This exaggerated economic behaviour is a direct result of gaian actions within gaia. If gaians can effect such great influence on the economy, does it not also stand to reason that gaians could also act in such a way to dampen this same economic behaviour?Quote: What we need to keep both buyers and sellers happy is a constant price! No it doesn't. It just sets things in that Bleh area that happens to fall in the middle. It won't make the rest of the angelbow sellers happy because as time goes on, the demand will rise, but you will force them to keep their prices down. And who's to say when and how much you change the price? Too high, too low, someone is bound to be upset. And this won't keep the buyers happy because it'll force them to compete with you for snatching up the cheap ones when they come on the market. I did not mean to imply that buyers and sellers would be overjoyed by a fixed union price. What I had meant to say was that both would be reasonably satisfied (thus happy) with the situation if the price didn't drop (sellers) and the price didn't inflate (buyers). Your point about the supply vs. demand is valid, and my previous point (from another post) regarding a negotiated new union price would probably be used by you to show that no, we are not keeping the price truly constant.
We are attempting to keep the price as constant as possible.
And though someone has already made the argument "why bother if it's not going to be forever", my response is that nothing lasts forever. Pencils eventually run out, so why buy them? Clothes wear out eventually. Even buildings are eventually torn down and replaced, but we keep making them because they serve a purpose while they still exist, and I believe that this union follows the same principle.
Another analogy: groceries. Back in the day, a kg of apples might have cost 5 cents. Now it costs more around the $4 mark due to a gradual inflation that came in slowly. There is also a possibility that apples may suddenly jump in price to $6/kg, or drop to $3/kg, depending on the week. Say you happened to need apples for a recipe and that on that particular week apples happened to be $6/kg. You wouldn't be happy. Wouldn't it be nice to not have to worry about buying things on special and just buying collectables whenever you have the gold, rather than hoping and making bets on whether the item will one day drop to something you can afford or purchasing the item only to find that you could have waited a little longer and save a few gold?
What this union attempts to do is nullify the effect of temporary spikes and troughs so that the price one week is pretty much the same price another week. Sure, it makes the marketplace a little boring if it works, but I for one prefer boredom to frustration.Quote: People have bought these things really cheap. Say someone has a hoard of 100, that they release when you AI them. The market for Angelbows would crash, and you'd lose lots of money. No one has addressed this point yet. It's a valid one. I saw it happen with BTK's a while back. My previous point, I think, makes it clear that this is not artificial inflation. This is setting an average price (higher than the current lowest, and lower than the current highest) for an item. With a large enough union, it would be possible to purchase the excess of items and gradually sell them back at the union price. Another point is that such a glut of items is short-term. In the long term, as more people join gaia, demand will always overtake supply. I hope that other people who are either for or against the idea of the union understand that the union is a long term thing, not something for short term gain.
My main concern, at this point, is the fact that eventually the demand would overtake supply too quickly and force an increase in the union price prematurely.Quote: t needs atleast SOME regulation ... and its perfectly fair to make unions like this, it helps raise demande .. plus if we keep the price stable than it wont go UP either ( ie no 8 mil items) You must live outside the US. Around here we call them monopolies. And no, it's not fair for a bunch of rich people to get together and decide to raise the demand for everyone else. And you must be a player of WOW (world of warcraft) where the "10 billion club" actually does that kind of thing. For this point, I would like to mention a person on page 12 or 13 who wanted into the union: she only has 10k. I'm not sure at this stage how we would work with members like her, but this shows that the union is not just for the ultra-rich.Quote: Say this Union actually goes somewhere, and keeps the price stable at 30k. What if the Union runs out? Are you going to buy the more expensive ones, to sell at a loss? I doubt that. All you're doing is promoting inflation. Valid point. Quote: he has a point ... but if the common price is 30k then who would sell it for 40k or 50k ... noody would but them ... unless your a complete n00b ... we trying to keep it from plummeting! Except you're completely wrong. Have you ever been to the marketplace? People do set things out at above the average price. Look up absolutely anything in there and you'll see it. Just because people do set things at above the MP price doesn't mean that those items sell just as often as the cheaper ones. As a buyer, I think I'd be more likely to purchase the cheaper option.Quote: excuse mee ... i think i understand economics i little better than you think, esp. since im taking business ... Quit being petulant. No one cares what classes you are taking, this is Gaia. Yes, this is Gaia: as long as you make an intelligent, polite argument it doesn't matter what classes you may or may not take.Quote: I'll have to give you that ... in the long run it isnt gonna work ... but were atleast goona try and control the price even its for a little bit Then what on earth is the point?! Prices stabilize on their own in the short term, save a bit of fluctuation. You said the problem was keeping the prices from inflating. This is a long term effect, and this union cannot 'fix' that. As I said before:
Quote: And though someone has already made the argument "why bother if it's not going to be forever", my response is that nothing lasts forever. Pencils eventually run out, so why buy them? Clothes wear out eventually. Even buildings are eventually torn down and replaced, but we keep making them because they serve a purpose while they still exist, and I believe that this union follows the same principle. Another analogy: groceries. Back in the day, a kg of apples might have cost 5 cents. Now it costs more around the $4 mark due to a gradual inflation that came in slowly. There is also a possibility that apples may suddenly jump in price to $6/kg, or drop to $3/kg, depending on the week. Say you happened to need apples for a recipe and that on that particular week apples happened to be $6/kg. You wouldn't be happy. Wouldn't it be nice to not have to worry about buying things on special and just buying collectables whenever you have the gold, rather than hoping and making bets on whether the item will one day drop to something you can afford or purchasing the item only to find that you could have waited a little longer and save a few gold? What this union attempts to do is nullify the effect of temporary spikes and troughs so that the price one week is pretty much the same price another week. Sure, it makes the marketplace a little boring if it works, but I for one prefer boredom to frustration. I know it's a long post, I'm an EDer at heart, but I whole-heartedly disagree with this idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 7:01 am
LemonWarlord ameshinju I agree with this idea and say, go for it! (Oshousama_Raistlin, I have sent you a trade for 10 gold) However, LemonWarlord posted something a while back that I disagree with. While they are trying to keep the price of the angelbow at 30k people will buy them for 30k, keep them for a while, get tired of them and sell them again at lower price, not higher, then it would be purchased by the union and sold for 30k again. Since the price is at 30k it would be stupid to price it higher, it would never sell. Good point, but there's always that percent that will never sell it unless it inflates. I think about 75% of the population would be like that. ...and your numbers come from where?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|